Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ridge sowing under deep tillage gave the maximum grain yield, biological yield and harvest index in maize.

A claim from TILLAGE PRACTICES AND SOWING METHODS AFFECT YIELD AND RELATED ATTRIBUTES OF MAIZE · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge sowing under deep tillage gave the maximum grain yield, biological yield and harvest index in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Ridge sowing under deep tillagee0
Outcome
grain and biological yield as well as harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ridge sowing under deep tillage resulted in maximum grains and grain weight per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain and biological yield as well as harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–867
e1

“maize hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–285

Title

TILLAGE PRACTICES AND SOWING METHODS AFFECT YIELD AND RELATED ATTRIBUTES OF MAIZE

Shakeel Ahmad Anjum; Farrukh Ehsan; İmran Khan; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9c22ea676ff9af75cae843d103b8c573ced7e52af90355044c7a7e19b98ebd1f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Ridge-sown maize under deep tillage had maximum net income.

    Morphological and Phenological Attributes of Maize Affected by Different Tillage Practices and Varied Sowing Methods · 2014 · compared with flat sowing was adopted under minimum tillage system

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Conventional tillage gave significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation.

    Effect of tillage practices and liquid seaweed as foliar spray on growth and yield of Sweet corn (Zea mays, saccharata, L.) · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    No-tillage without red clover reduced corn grain yield by 13% versus conventional tillage over three years.

    Red Clover and Tillage Influence on Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Corn Emergence · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage treatment

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.