Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend adoption of mechanization because machinery increased income and net gain.
- Outcome
- Mechanization could be adopted by the farmerse0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Mechanization could be adopted by the farmers since all the machineries resulted in higher income and higher net gain.”
Title
An economic analysis of farm mechanization in Sivagangai district of Tamil Nadu, India
J.S. Amarnath International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Owned machine farms had 19.37 per cent higher yield than hired machine farms.
- Observation Owned machine farms had 15.66 per cent higher input cost than hired farms.
- Observation Owned machine farms had 17.83 higher crop income than hired farms.
- Observation Owned machine farms had 321.37 per cent higher off-farm income than hired farms.
- Observation The thresher had the highest break-even point at 2496.57 hrs/ annum.
- Observation Partial budgeting found a net gain for all machinery.
- Association Human labour cost and input cost were determinants of mechanization on owned farms.
- Association Human labour cost, input cost and productivity were determinants of mechanization on hired farms.
- Observation The existing Paddy, Sugarcane and Groundnut plan yielded Rs. 138320/ha net income.
- Observation The optimal plan had 45.99 per cent higher income than the existing plan.