Claim · model-written summary
Night-break effects on rice were quantitatively controlled by light quality.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- light qualitye0
- Outcome
- effect of NBe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of NB is quantitatively controlled by light quality”
t0“rice flowering”
Title
Ryo Ishikawa; Tomoko Shinomura; Makoto Takano; et al. Genes & Genetic Systems 2009. doi:10.1266/ggs.84.179
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect A night break delayed rice flowering.
- Intervention effect A night break downregulated Hd3a expression in rice.
- Observation Phytochrome B mutants did not respond to night break in rice.
- Intervention effect Night break did not affect flowering time in rice phytochrome B mutants.
- Association Night-break effects on rice were quantitatively controlled by light intensity or duration.
- Intervention effect Red light downregulated rice Hd3a expression.
- Intervention effect Blue light downregulated rice Hd3a expression.
- Intervention effect Far-red light night break did not downregulate rice Hd3a expression.
- Association The red-light night-break effect on rice Hd3a depended on photon fluence.
- Intervention effect Subsequent far-red irradiation restored the red-light night-break effect on rice Hd3a.
- Mechanism The authors suggest phyB regulation of Hd3a transcription mediates the quantitative night-break effect on rice flowering.