Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same INM practice gave higher Zn and Fe uptake than RDF.

A claim from Response of integrated nutrient management on productivity and nutrient uptake of rainfed pigeonpea based intercropping systems · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same INM practice gave higher Zn and Fe uptake than RDF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF+PSB+ Rhizobium + FYM @ 3 t/ha + 'Harit-vardan' @ 5 kg/hae2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
Zn and Fee2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Qualifier
total uptake of N, P, K, Zn and Fe by plante2
Comparator
RDFe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of integrated nutrient management on productivity and nutrient uptake of rainfed pigeonpea based intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127
e2

“application of RDF+PSB+ Rhizobium + FYM @ 3 t/ha + 'Harit-vardan' @ 5 kg/ha recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (18.65 and 15.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (25.35 and 23.47 q/ha), B:C ratio (2.18 and 2.20, and total uptake of N, P, K, Zn and Fe by plant, respectively over RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1291

Title

Response of integrated nutrient management on productivity and nutrient uptake of rainfed pigeonpea based intercropping systems

Atik Ahamad; Neeraj Kumar; Nishi Roy; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9dab79671fe04cef086a01b63462a5ef82b45ed8a001694c0d6f66f8603a2508 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer