Claim · model-written summary
The optimal practice in Autumn–Winter was A2-F1-I1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- A2-F1-I1e4
- Outcome
- optimal practicee4
- Setting
- Autumn–Winter seasonse4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“improving greenhouse tomato production”
e4“Combining the Maximal Information Coefficient and TOPSIS models, the optimal practice was A1-F1-I1 in Spring–Summer and A2-F1-I1 in Autumn–Winter seasons”
Title
Yanan Sun; Huayu Zhong; Huanjie Cai; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15092026
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Aeration and fertilization significantly increased CO2 and N2O emissions in greenhouse tomato.
- Association Aeration and fertilization significantly reduced CH4 emissions in greenhouse tomato.
- Intervention effect Warmer Spring–Summer conditions elevated all GHG emissions compared with Autumn–Winter seasons.
- Association Tomato yield was 12.05% higher in Spring–Summer.
- Association Net GHG emissions were 24.3% higher in Spring–Summer.
- Association Net global warming potential (NGWP) was 14.46% higher in Spring–Summer.
- Association GHG intensity (GHGI) was 2.37% higher in Spring–Summer.
- Observation The optimal practice in Spring–Summer was A1-F1-I1.