Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Within two months of the first biocontrol application in a Mississippi Delta corn field, the percentage of soil-inhabiting aflatoxigenic A. flavus strains in some plots was reduced from 48% to 9% of the population.

A claim from Field Displacement of Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Strains Through Repeated Biological Control Applications · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within two months of the first biocontrol application in a Mississippi Delta corn field, the percentage of soil-inhabiting aflatoxigenic A. flavus strains in some plots was reduced from 48% to 9% of the population.

Treatment
first biocontrol applicatione2
Interactor
aflatoxigenic A. flavus strainse1pathogen
Second interactor
biocontrol strainse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage of soil-inhabiting aflatoxigenic A. flavus strainse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
from 48% to 9%e1
Setting
Mississippi Deltae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3.2 ha commercial corn field in the Mississippi Delta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–492
e1

“the percentage of soil-inhabiting aflatoxigenic A. flavus strains in some plots was reduced from 48% to 9% of the population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–750
e2

“Within two months of the first biocontrol application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–624
e3

“Three biocontrol strains (NRRL 21882, 18543 and 30797)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–378

Title

Field Displacement of Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Strains Through Repeated Biological Control Applications

Mark A. Weaver; Hamed K. Abbas Frontiers in Microbiology 2019. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01788

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9dd02df35b8e1487e8310e321ba78194df69da819efc748b931b32230f8a3bf5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.