Claim · model-written summary
Wheat gluten index did not correlate with other quality parameters and was a poor quality predictor.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- predictor of qualitye0
- Comparator
- other parameterse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat GI was not a good predictor of quality and did not correlate with other parameters”
Title
Sowing Date and Wheat Quality as Determined by Gluten Index
David J. Bonfil; Shahal Abbo; Tal Svoray Crop Science 2015. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0562
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Gluten index showed a significant environment by cultivar by sowing date interaction.
- Intervention effect Gluten index increased with delayed sowing in two experiments.
- Intervention effect In two other experiments, gluten index increased from early to normal sowing, with no further increase at late sowing.
- Intervention effect Gluten index was unaffected by sowing date in one experiment.
- Intervention effect Dough tenacity increased with delayed sowing.
- Association Grain protein, wet gluten, SDS sedimentation, and alveograph index were highly correlated.
- Method / resource Flour gluten index had better correlations.
- Recommendation The authors suggest delaying wheat sowing to increase gluten index.
- Recommendation The authors advise caution when using gluten index to predict quality.
- Recommendation The authors suggest other methods to improve wheat quality determination.