Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest other methods to improve wheat quality determination.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- using different methods may improve the determination of wheat qualitye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using different methods may improve the determination of wheat quality”
Title
Sowing Date and Wheat Quality as Determined by Gluten Index
David J. Bonfil; Shahal Abbo; Tal Svoray Crop Science 2015. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0562
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Gluten index showed a significant environment by cultivar by sowing date interaction.
- Intervention effect Gluten index increased with delayed sowing in two experiments.
- Intervention effect In two other experiments, gluten index increased from early to normal sowing, with no further increase at late sowing.
- Intervention effect Gluten index was unaffected by sowing date in one experiment.
- Intervention effect Dough tenacity increased with delayed sowing.
- Association Grain protein, wet gluten, SDS sedimentation, and alveograph index were highly correlated.
- Method / resource Wheat gluten index did not correlate with other quality parameters and was a poor quality predictor.
- Method / resource Flour gluten index had better correlations.
- Recommendation The authors suggest delaying wheat sowing to increase gluten index.
- Recommendation The authors advise caution when using gluten index to predict quality.