Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increased soil tillage depth reduced sugar beet root yield and quality.

A claim from Impact of sowing depth and seedbed rolling on sugar beet. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil tillage depth reduced sugar beet root yield and quality.

Treatment
an increase in soil tillage depthe1
Outcome
root yield and qualitye1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
Experimental Station of the Lithuanian University of Agriculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trial was conducted on a silty loam LVg-p-w-cc(sc)-Calc(ar)i-Epihypogleyic Luvisol at the Experimental Station of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture in 2004, 2005, 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178
e1

“an increase in soil tillage depth reduced sugar beet seed field germination, crop density, root yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–709

Title

Impact of sowing depth and seedbed rolling on sugar beet.

Kęstutis Romaneckas; Regina Romaneckienė; Vytautas Pilipavičius; et al. Vytautas Magnus University 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-9e10c342b7d6448043b630ad65d9a64a0b4314dd4e4b6a19fc18a6ddf78fb772 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.