Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Authors concluded tillage improved sugar beet root yield and quality characteristics.

A claim from Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet · 2012

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded tillage improved sugar beet root yield and quality characteristics.

Treatment
tillage operationse0
Outcome
root yield and quality characteristicse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage operations were useful in improving the root yield and quality characteristics of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1044

Title

Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet

Shahram Mohseni Niari; Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi; Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi; et al. 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-c996c3a0c7be28cccf367df2714f9be1075132bad12671acf7c93d0636152ebb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Across 4 years, deep tillage had no statistically significant effect on sugarbeet root yield and quality compared with ST and NT.

    Effect of Three Tillage Depths on Sugarbeet Response and Soil Penetrability Resistance · 2015 · compared with both ST and NT

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Reduced tillage did not worsen technological root quality.

    Effect of different tillage methods on the nutritional status, yield and quality of sugar beets · 2015

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Tillage had no significant influence on sugar beet root quality.

    Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under an intensive and conservation soil tillage pattern: II. Crop productivity. · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increased soil tillage depth reduced sugar beet root yield and quality.

    Impact of sowing depth and seedbed rolling on sugar beet. · 2009

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage method did not affect yield, quality or recoverable sucrose.

    Minimum vs. Conventional Tillage in Commercial Sugarbeet Production1 · 1978 · compared with Conventional Tillage

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    That weed and nitrogen management reduced the detrimental effect of nitrogen on quality characteristics.

    Effect of Nitrogen and Weed Interference on the Quality and Quantity of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) · 2020

    Same direction

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.