Claim · model-written summary
Second-season winter wheat grain yield did not differ significantly among subsoiling treatments.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- subsoiling treatmentse1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- insignificant differencee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“insignificant difference in subsequent grain yield of SM and winter wheat in the second growing season (WW2)”
e1“subsoiling treatments”
Title
Xuezhen Wang; Hao Zhou; Yuxiang Huang; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture12101684
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected soil moisture content in the first winter wheat season.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected soil bulk density.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected first-season winter wheat root number.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected first-season winter wheat panicle number.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected first-season winter wheat grain yield.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected first-season winter wheat thousand kernel weight.
- Intervention effect Wing mounting height significantly affected summer maize thousand kernel weight.
- Intervention effect Lower wing mounting height generally improved soil properties.
- Intervention effect Lower wing mounting height generally improved crop performance.
- Intervention effect Subsequent summer maize grain yield did not differ significantly among subsoiling treatments.