Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.

A claim from Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
did not control weedse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
number of shoots per unit areae2
Direction
lesse2
Value
15%e2
Comparator
weed-free control plotse2
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156
e2

“the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-9efd3bc30b71d6cd54f9799407393067a580d75b04e75f343fe4b1c0c895fc29 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer