Observationmodel-written summary

Two strains that grew well under low pH and high salinity were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens.

A claim from Biocontrol of Macrophomina phaseolina Using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strains in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) · 2022

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two strains that grew well under low pH and high salinity were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens.

Outcome
identified as B. amyloliquefaciense5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–111
e5

“Two strains that grew well under low pH and high salinity, named BsA3MX and BsC11MX, were isolated and identified as B. amyloliquefaciens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–505

Title

Biocontrol of Macrophomina phaseolina Using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strains in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

Edelweiss Airam Rangel-Montoya; Carmen Sanjuana Delgado-Ramírez; Edgardo Sepulveda; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12030676

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9fc093fa0f1660cc1c24296dc30acee7ff0ebd0e1a487600fc7f8899a39bf9bf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer