Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays were on par with calcium chloride and 200 ppm NAA for total soluble solids and reducing sugar.

A claim from Effect of pre-harvest treatments of growth regulators, chemicals and fungicides on storage behaviour of seedless grapes cv. SONAKA · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays were on par with calcium chloride and 200 ppm NAA for total soluble solids and reducing sugar.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
calcium nitratee3
Outcome
TSS and reducing sugare4
Direction
on pare4
Comparator
calcium chloride treatment and 200 ppm NAAe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“seedless grapes cv. SONAKA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130
e3

“Maximum per cent total soluble solids (25.07%), total sugars (24.42%), and reducing sugars (23.00 %) and non-reducing sugars (1.41%) were recorded in treatments imposed with calcium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–797
e4

“It was on par with calcium chloride treatment and 200 ppm NAA with respect to TSS and reducing sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–899

Title

Effect of pre-harvest treatments of growth regulators, chemicals and fungicides on storage behaviour of seedless grapes cv. SONAKA

S.B. BIRADARPATIL; LAXMAN KUKNOOR; A.S. PARMESHWAR THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE 2015. doi:10.15740/has/tajh/10.1/144-148

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-a0b4db32150237afe45747f62c97962270f738e18068fb0f08ef2dd70050f336 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

calcium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.