Claim · model-written summary
SD-CRF reduced total energy input by 2.4% relative to S-CRF.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SD-CRFe0
- Outcome
- total energy inpute0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 2.4%e0
- Comparator
- S-CRFe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to FPP and S-CRF, SD-CRF increased grain yields by 11.3% and 9.2%, respectively, while reducing total energy input by 2.5% and 2.4%”
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Production”
Title
Manman Yuan; Jiabao Wang; Gang Wu; et al. Agriculture 2026. doi:10.3390/agriculture16060651
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect SD-CRF raised rice grain yield by 11.3% relative to FPP.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF raised rice grain yield by 9.2% relative to S-CRF.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF reduced total energy input by 2.5% relative to FPP.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF lowered carbon intensity by 9.7% relative to FPP.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF lowered carbon intensity by 8.2% relative to S-CRF.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF increased net income by 81.8% compared with FPP.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF increased benefit-to-cost ratio by 37.4% compared with FPP.
- Intervention effect SD-CRF reduced labor input by 40.0% compared with FPP.
- Observation SD-CRF had superior eco-efficiency in data envelopment analysis.