Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cassava tuber yield was maximal at the narrowest cassava spacing and highest cowpea density in both seasons.

A claim from Studies on Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) Intercropped with Fodder Cowpea ( Vigna sinensis L.) in Sandy Soil · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava tuber yield was maximal at the narrowest cassava spacing and highest cowpea density in both seasons.

Treatment
lowest cassava spacing (1.0 m x 0.75 m)e0
Outcome
yield of cassava tuberse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
highest cowpea plant density (42000 plants/fed) in both seasonse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yield of cassava tubers was associated with lowest cassava spacing (1.0 m x 0.75 m) associated with highest cowpea plant density (42000 plants/fed) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–735

Title

Studies on Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) Intercropped with Fodder Cowpea ( Vigna sinensis L.) in Sandy Soil

Sahar Sherif; Azza Kh; Salem; et al. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2011. doi:10.21608/agro.2011.152

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-a2340cfb9e30ff46635e676f6fd87f9fda642f448bd730e2d3ee7444e4f43625 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.