Mechanismmodel-written summary

Lower P uptake from the 30 cm band is apparently due to another wheat row shielding the fertilizer P.

A claim from Optimum Spacing of Preplant Bands of N and P Fertilizer for Winter Wheat1 · 1984

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lower P uptake from the 30 cm band is apparently due to another wheat row shielding the fertilizer P.

Outcome
P uptakee4
Qualifier
another row of wheat shielding the fertilizer P from uptakee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72
e4

“By 40 days after planting, however, uptake of fertilizer P was the same from bands placed 0, 10, and 20 cm from the wheat row, while P uptake was significantly less from the band placed 30 cm from the row, apparently due to another row of wheat shielding the fertilizer P from uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–978

Title

Optimum Spacing of Preplant Bands of N and P Fertilizer for Winter Wheat1

T. M. Maxwell; D. E. Kissel; M. G. Wagger; et al. Agronomy Journal 1984. doi:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020017x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a2f7ebda96b9ea6413c15c2e31cd6444ce76c7db76c506225465fcdabeb93829 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer