Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mineral fertilization had a negligible effect on cellulose content of Jerusalem artichoke biomass compared with the unfertilized control.

A claim from Effect of sewage sludge and mineral fertilization on ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke and optimization of the bioconversion process · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization had a negligible effect on cellulose content of Jerusalem artichoke biomass compared with the unfertilized control.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
cellulose contente0
Direction
negligible effecte0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sewage sludge fertilization increased cellulose content by 14% compared to the unfertilized control, while mineral fertilization had a negligible effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–581
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Effect of sewage sludge and mineral fertilization on ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke and optimization of the bioconversion process

Tomasz Pokój; Bogdan Dubis; Małgorzata Lewandowska; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29990-4

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a3039fe86c264939a6f5c61972bb8c00eaa59d5b62d93044fb3608e98787739e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.