Claim · model-written summary
Seed nematicides did not consistently suppress root galling in either cultivar class in the field.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- seed-applied nematicidese0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitat0pathogen - Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Qualifier
- none of the seed-applied nematicides consistentlye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“none of the seed-applied nematicides consistently suppressed root galling or protected grain yield in either the susceptible or partially resistant soybean cultivars in the field experiments.”
t0“Meloidogyne incognita on susceptible and partially resistant soybean cultivars”
Title
Brandon Baker; Michael Emerson; Katherine Brown; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-03-26-0573-re
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Fluopyram reduced root galling on susceptible soybean in the greenhouse compared with other nematicides and the untreated control.
- Intervention effect Fluopyram reduced nematode reproduction on susceptible soybean in the greenhouse.
- Intervention effect Seed nematicides did not consistently protect grain yield in either cultivar class in field experiments.
- Intervention effect Nematicides provided an average of 0.3% yield protection for susceptible cultivars.
- Intervention effect Nematicides had no measurable effect on partially resistant cultivars.
- Observation Partially resistant cultivars averaged 50% greater grain yield than the susceptible cultivar.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that host resistance is the most effective and reliable management strategy for soybean under high nematode density.