Claim · model-written summary
Computed cotton totals had an average error of 1.5 per cent over 15 years.
- Taxon
- COTTON
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- average error in the computed totalse0
- Value
- 1.5 per cente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the average error in the computed totals for the 15-year period was only 1.5 per cent”
t0“COTTON”
Title
COMPUTING THE COTTON CROP FROM WEATHER RECORDS AND GINNING REPORTS
JOSEPH BURTON KINCER Monthly Weather Review 1921. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1921)49<295:ctccfw>2.0.co;2
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Harvest speed varied with crop maturity and weather.
- Association Earlier-season ginning amounts depended principally on maturity timing.
- Association Later-season harvest speed was determined by prevailing weather.
- Observation On November 1, an average 37 per cent of the matured cotton crop remained to be ginned.
- Observation An average 57 per cent of the cotton remaining unginned on November 1 was ginned during November.
- Association November weather produced substantial year-to-year variation in the November ginned percentage.
- Association Rainy and cloudy days had a close negative association with the November ginned percentage, with correlation −0.91 ±0.03.
- Method / resource The computed total had at least 2 per cent error in five of 15 years.
- Method / resource The computed total had less than one-half of 1 per cent error in one-third of years.
- Method / resource The equation could compute the cotton crop in less than 5 minutes after December 1 ginning data became available.