Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Waterlogging stress had a stronger reduction effect on fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area than moisture deficit and the control.

A claim from Phenotypic and yield responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) varieties to different soil moisture levels · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging stress had a stronger reduction effect on fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area than moisture deficit and the control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Waterlogging stresse5
Outcome
fresh weight, dry weight and leaf areae5
Direction
stronger reduction effecte5
Comparator
moisture deficit and the controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–79
e5

“Waterlogging stress had a stronger reduction effect on the fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area of common bean varieties than moisture deficit and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2082

Title

Phenotypic and yield responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) varieties to different soil moisture levels

Refisa Jebessa Geleta; Amsalu Gobena Roro; Meseret Tesema Terfa BMC Plant Biology 2024. doi:10.1186/s12870-024-04856-5

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a4ea8ef1b4c779563c306c319db7cc8f2f7d1c4e1d6380d415ecc514ac1adc4f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Drought and flooding had relatively positive effects on the growth of bean, which germinated and grew under both conditions.

    Effects of drought and flooding on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): a comparison · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Root hypoxia reduced leaf growth rates under all vapor-pressure conditions.

    The Influence of Leaf Water Status and ABA on Leaf Growth and Stomata of Phaseolus Seedlings with Hypoxic Roots · 1991

    Same direction

  3. negative
    Root weight reduction due to flooding was greatest in pink and small red cultivars.

    Genetic Architecture of Flooding Tolerance in the Dry Bean Middle-American Diversity Panel · 2017

    Same direction

  4. negative
    Anoxia reduced bean hypocotyl growth rate by about 85%.

    Structure and function of the elongation sink in the stems of higher plants I. Effects of anoxia and IAA on the growth rate and the spatially separate electrogenic ion pumps · 1980

    Same direction

  5. negative
    Even one day of flooding decreased plant dry weight, with greater decreases over longer flooding.

    Flooding Reduces Gas Exchange and Growth in Snap Bean · 1991

    Same direction

  6. negative
    Flooding significantly reduced root dry weight.

    Genotypic variation in growth and physiological responses of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings to flooding · 2011

    Same direction

  7. negative
    Shoot and root growth of bean cultivars were reduced in the anoxic (non-aerated) control compared with the aerated control.

    Effect of Localized Anoxia onPhaseolus vulgarisL. Root Growth · 1984 · compared with aerated control

    Same direction

  8. negative
    Flooding caused greater growth reduction at vegetative stage.

    Different Physiological Reactions at Vegetative and Generative Stage of Development of Field Bean Plants Exposed to Flooding and Undergoing Recovery · 2012

    Same direction

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.