Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water stress largely did not alter transcript populations in root region R1.

A claim from Comparing regional transcript profiles from maize primary roots under well-watered and low water potential conditions · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress largely did not alter transcript populations in root region R1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
R1e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
largely unaffectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize primary roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–63
e0

“populations were largely unaffected by water stress in R1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–911

Title

Comparing regional transcript profiles from maize primary roots under well-watered and low water potential conditions

V Poroyko; WG Spollen; LG Hejlek; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl119

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a503e9ce4ca6c045f7f6ef6b14b1e0555466a83de3edd018673ca921c30eb266 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

drought · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 4 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.