Claim · model-written summary
At one day postexposure, the heat shocked extract had lower LC50 than control extract.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- HS extracte0
- Outcome
- activitye0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 39.52e0
- Qualifier
- 1687.82e0
- Comparator
- Con extracte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TOMATO SEEDLINGS”
e0“HS extract exhibited more activity (39.52 and 26.85 ppm) than Con extract (1687.82 and 208.61 ppm) at 1 and 2 DPE, respectively.”
Title
The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2025. doi:10.36899/japs.2025.5.0121
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Heat shocked tomato leaves contained 18 detected molecules versus 11 in controls.
- Observation Thirteen compounds were detected only in heat shocked tomato extracts.
- Intervention effect Heat shocked tomato extract caused 100% rice weevil mortality compared with 60% for control extract at 5000 ppm on day 1.
- Association Weevil mortality correlated positively with extract concentration (R 2 = 0.95).
- Intervention effect At two days postexposure, the heat shocked extract had lower LC50 than control extract.
- Intervention effect At three days postexposure, the LC50 difference between heat shocked and control extracts was insignificant.
- Mechanism The authors attributed insecticidal activity to methyl ketones and phthalic acid esters.
- Recommendation The authors propose both extracts as substitutes for insecticides against the rice weevil.