Claim · model-written summary
At three days postexposure, the LC50 difference between heat shocked and control extracts was insignificant.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- HSe0
- Outcome
- differencee0
- Value
- 10.79e0
- Qualifier
- 11.08e0
- Comparator
- Cone0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TOMATO SEEDLINGS”
e0“the difference was insignificant at 3 DPE (10.79 for HS and 11.08 for Con)”
Title
The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2025. doi:10.36899/japs.2025.5.0121
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Heat shocked tomato leaves contained 18 detected molecules versus 11 in controls.
- Observation Thirteen compounds were detected only in heat shocked tomato extracts.
- Intervention effect Heat shocked tomato extract caused 100% rice weevil mortality compared with 60% for control extract at 5000 ppm on day 1.
- Association Weevil mortality correlated positively with extract concentration (R 2 = 0.95).
- Intervention effect At one day postexposure, the heat shocked extract had lower LC50 than control extract.
- Intervention effect At two days postexposure, the heat shocked extract had lower LC50 than control extract.
- Mechanism The authors attributed insecticidal activity to methyl ketones and phthalic acid esters.
- Recommendation The authors propose both extracts as substitutes for insecticides against the rice weevil.