Claim · model-written summary
Protein functional classes differed between the rootstocks.
- Outcome
- particular differences between the two rootstockse0
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“many proteins classified as active in energy metabolism, hormone metabolism, protein, secondary metabolism and stress functional classes showed particular differences between the two rootstocks.”
t0“grapevine”
Title
Bhakti Prinsi; Alfredo Simone Negri; Osvaldo Failla; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2018. doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1343-0
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Water stress changed abundance of 17% of detected proteins in 101.14 roots.
- Observation Water stress changed abundance of 22% of detected proteins in M4 roots.
- Observation Proteomic changes in metabolic pathways aligned with metabolite data.
- Mechanism M4 showed metabolic responses potentially counteracting water stress effects.
- Observation 101.14 roots suffered more severely from the water stress effects.
- Mechanism Osmotic responses, carbon metabolism, mitochondrial function and stress responses were interpreted as central to water stress tolerance.