Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stomatal conductance of Arachis hypogaea declined by -42.7% relative to control rates after ethylene exposure.

A claim from The Response of Foliar Gas Exchange to Exogenously Applied · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance of Arachis hypogaea declined by -42.7% relative to control rates after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae5
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
-42.7%e5
Comparator
control ratese5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The responsiveness to ethylene of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to water vapor in intact plants was investigated in 13 herbaceous species representing seven plant families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–185
e5

“As a function of control rates, the most marked and statistically significant responses of stomatal conductance were in Glycine max (-53.6%), Gossypium hirsutum (-51.2%), Arachis hypogaea (-42.7%), Phaseolus vulgaris (-38.6%), Raphanus sativus (-26.8%), and Solanum tuberosum (-23.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1814

Title

The Response of Foliar Gas Exchange to Exogenously Applied

George Taylor; Carla A. Gunderson 1986

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-a5bab5ffaf18747d8a354f11980139c403a42eaadf293100b0241f64843d39eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

ethene · physiology: gas exchange · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.