Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying 125% RDF increased cane diameter, millable cane count and cane yield across seasons.

A claim from Productivity and profitability of different genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) as affected by fertility levels and planting seasons · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 125% RDF increased cane diameter, millable cane count and cane yield across seasons.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125% recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
cane diametere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“cane diameter (2.38 and 2.18 cm), number of millable canes (107.1 and 105.0 thousand/ha) and cane yield (86.0 and 79.9 t/ha) were obtained with the application of 125% recommended dose of fertilizer in autumn and spring sea- son, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1351
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–66
t1

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–66

Title

Productivity and profitability of different genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) as affected by fertility levels and planting seasons

NAVNIT KUMAR; HARENDRA SINGH; RAKESH KUMAR; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v57i2.4619

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-a6433e77c47404eb59c38010dfad9cb2010bb37daadec19bb5b10ceb04da9d25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.