Claim · model-written summary
AWD had no adverse effect on rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- AWD- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- no adverse effecte0
- Comparator
- conventional irrigation practicee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no adverse effect of AWD- irrigation on grain yields of rice.”
e1“conventional irrigation practice”
Title
MM Husain; M Shahe Alam; MH Kabir; et al. The Agriculturists 2010. doi:10.3329/agric.v7i1.5591
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect AWD saved about 365 mm, or about 27%, of irrigation water relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Farmers perceived AWD as reducing irrigation cost.
- Intervention effect Farmers perceived AWD as increasing weed infestation.
- Association AWD was associated with higher weeding cost.
- Observation AWD demonstrations impressed farmers as a water saving and low cost method.
- Recommendation Timely irrigation availability is a precondition for farmer adoption of AWD.
- Recommendation Weed management using appropriate herbicides is necessary for AWD adoption.