Claim · model-written summary
Farmers perceived AWD as increasing weed infestation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- AWD methode0
- Outcome
- weed infestatione0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- as perceived by farmerse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AWD method as perceived by farmers, although reduced irrigation cost, resulted in more weed infestation and was associated with more weeding cost.”
e1“Boro rice-variety BRRI dhan29”
Title
MM Husain; M Shahe Alam; MH Kabir; et al. The Agriculturists 2010. doi:10.3329/agric.v7i1.5591
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect AWD saved about 365 mm, or about 27%, of irrigation water relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect AWD had no adverse effect on rice grain yield.
- Intervention effect Farmers perceived AWD as reducing irrigation cost.
- Association AWD was associated with higher weeding cost.
- Observation AWD demonstrations impressed farmers as a water saving and low cost method.
- Recommendation Timely irrigation availability is a precondition for farmer adoption of AWD.
- Recommendation Weed management using appropriate herbicides is necessary for AWD adoption.