Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raised beds increased root biomass over flat beds by 22.3%.

A claim from Productivity and profitability of tropical sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties under various land configurations in Vertisols · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased root biomass over flat beds by 22.3%.

Treatment
raised bede0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.3e0
Comparator
flat bede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly the maximum values for fresh foliage, root and total biomass of sugarbeet were observed in raised bed (23.36, 68.36 and 91.72 t/ha), being 40.3, 22.3 and 26.5% higher, respec- tively, over flat bed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–710
t0

“sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69

Title

Productivity and profitability of tropical sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties under various land configurations in Vertisols

STUTI DEBAPRIYA BEHERA; M.K. ARVADIA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v64i2.5270

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-a77bb22936db9cb376e7795d639b2bb2be575d6e1ed58c9364acf1c74be31383 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.