Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation increased pearl millet ear head girth, test weight and yield versus rainfed conditions.

A claim from Performance of pearl millet genotypes under irrigated and rainfed conditions at Hisar, India · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased pearl millet ear head girth, test weight and yield versus rainfed conditions.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
irrigated conditione0
Outcome
ear head girth, test weight and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rainfed conditione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated condition recorded significantly (p < 0.05) higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, root dry weight, ear head girth, test weight and yield of pearl millet than rainfed condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–495

Title

Performance of pearl millet genotypes under irrigated and rainfed conditions at Hisar, India

Arvind Kumar Yadav; Anil Kumar; Jagdev Singh; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2014. doi:10.31018/jans.v6i2.431

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a864d784e4ebebd2f158452b8b9750bef9769e0ebb2f615988baa5815f6ebeb8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.