Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Hydrogel and Irrigation Regimes on Chlorophyll Content, Nitrogen and Some Growth Indices and Yield of Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

L. Keshavarz; H. Farahbakhsh; Pooran Golkar

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought stress has an important role in yield reduction of crops. To investigate the effects of applying zeolite hydrogel (as a superabsorbent) in reduction of adverse effects of drought stress on chlorophyll content, nitrogen, growth indices and their relationships with quantitative and qualitative yield of pearl millet (cv. Nitrifeed), a split plot experiment (in space and time), based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications, was carried out at Research Farm of Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran, in 2011. Treatments included drought stress at four levels (irrigation at 40, 60, 80 and 100% of field capacity) as the main factor and superabsorbent hydrogel at three levels (0, 150 and 300 kg/ha) as the sub-factor. Results revealed that there was a positive and significant correlation (r = 0.97**) between chlorophyll content and leaf nitrogen percentage. Also, significant correlation was observed between these traits and forage fresh and dry weight of forage, protein yield and raw fiber percentage of the forage. As drought stress increased, the measured traits showed a descending trend. The superabsorbent polymer increased the fresh and dry weight of forage, growth indices and qualitative traits of pearl millet. Mean fresh weight of forage, chlorophyll content, protein content and percentage of fiber showed no significant difference between 100% and 80% irrigation levels. Superabsorbent application led to 20% water saving. Therefore, it can be said that superabsorbent hydrogel application under drought stress will improve yield, qualitative traits and growth indices of pearl millet through increasing soil water holding capacity, reducing nutrient leaching, fast and optimal growth of roots and better soil aeration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was positively and significantly correlated with leaf nitrogen percentage (r = 0.97).

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen percentagee0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a positive and significant correlation (r = 0.97**) between chlorophyll content and leaf nitrogen percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–888 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll-related traits were significantly correlated with forage fresh and dry weight and protein yield.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
forage fresh and dry weight of forage, protein yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a positive and significant correlation (r = 0.97**) between chlorophyll content and leaf nitrogen percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant correlation was observed between these traits and forage fresh and dry weight of forage, protein yield and raw fiber percentage of the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1049 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll-related traits were significantly correlated with raw fiber percentage of the forage.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
raw fiber percentagee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a positive and significant correlation (r = 0.97**) between chlorophyll content and leaf nitrogen percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant correlation was observed between these traits and forage fresh and dry weight of forage, protein yield and raw fiber percentage of the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1049 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured traits decreased as drought stress increased.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
measured traitse2
Direction
descendinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e2

“As drought stress increased, the measured traits showed a descending trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent polymer increased forage fresh and dry weight and growth indices of pearl millet.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere3
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of forage, growth indicese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“The superabsorbent polymer increased the fresh and dry weight of forage, growth indices and qualitative traits of pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent polymer increased qualitative traits of pearl millet.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
superabsorbent polymere3
Outcome
qualitative traitse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“The superabsorbent polymer increased the fresh and dry weight of forage, growth indices and qualitative traits of pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight of forage, chlorophyll content and protein content did not differ significantly between 80% and 100% irrigation.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
80% irrigation levelse4
Outcome
Mean fresh weight of forage, chlorophyll content, protein contente4
Direction
no significant differencee4
Comparator
100%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mean fresh weight of forage, chlorophyll content, protein content and percentage of fiber showed no significant difference between 100% and 80% irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage of fiber did not differ significantly between 80% and 100% irrigation.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
80% irrigation levelse4
Outcome
percentage of fibere4
Direction
no significant differencee4
Comparator
100%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mean fresh weight of forage, chlorophyll content, protein content and percentage of fiber showed no significant difference between 100% and 80% irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent application saved 20% water.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Superabsorbent applicatione5
Outcome
water savinge5
Value
20%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Superabsorbent application led to 20% water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1468 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Superabsorbent hydrogel under drought stress is expected to improve yield, qualitative traits and growth indices of pearl millet through soil water and root mechanisms.

Taxon
Pennisetum glaucumCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
superabsorbent hydrogel application under drought stresse6
Outcome
yield, qualitative traits and growth indicese6
Qualifier
through increasing soil water holding capacity, reducing nutrient leaching, fast and optimal growth of roots and better soil aeratione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–149 · show in text ↑
e6

“superabsorbent hydrogel application under drought stress will improve yield, qualitative traits and growth indices of pearl millet through increasing soil water holding capacity, reducing nutrient leaching, fast and optimal growth of roots and better soil aeration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1765 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.