Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No tillage at Cacinci had the lowest percentage of Fusarium-infected wheat grains.

A claim from The impact of different conservation soil tillage and nitrogen fertilization on wheat grain infection with Fusarium sp. · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage at Cacinci had the lowest percentage of Fusarium-infected wheat grains.

Treatment
no tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
Fusarium sp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp.e0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
Cacincie0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp. was recorded in conventional tillage on location Magadenovac and no tillage treatments on location Cacinci.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1083

Title

The impact of different conservation soil tillage and nitrogen fertilization on wheat grain infection with Fusarium sp.

Karolina Vrandečić; Danijel Jug; Jasenka Ćosić; et al. Poljoprivreda 2019. doi:10.18047/poljo.25.1.4

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a8fc3d4f6ea1cce07fb0f3780f014b8820899d4815c5cb7095fd69a3224a0a0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.