Abstract
The effect of different conservation soil tillage (CST) treatments and different level of nitrogen fertilization on Fusarium wheat grain infection on two locations are presented in this paper. The research was conducted on winter wheat with different soil tillage treatments: conventional tillage to 30 cm depth, subsoiling to 35-40 cm depth, chiselling up to 25 cm, disk-harrowing to 10-15 cm and no-tillage, without any tillage treatments and three different nitrogen rates (N1 - amount reduced by 30% of recommended; N2 - according to standard recommendation and N3 - amount increased by 30% of recommended). The occurrence of Fusarium species was determined in all the tested variants of tillage and fertilization treatments. The effect of reduced fertilization (N1) on Fusarium sp. grain infection in all tillage treatments was statistically lower in comparison with other (N2 and N3) nitrogen treatments. The lowest percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp. was recorded in conventional tillage on location Magadenovac and no tillage treatments on location Cacinci.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium species occurred in every tested tillage and fertilization variant.
- Interactor
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1host - Outcome
- occurrence of Fusarium speciese0
- Qualifier
- all the tested variants of tillage and fertilization treatmentse0
FusariumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The occurrence of Fusarium species was determined in all the tested variants of tillage and fertilization treatments.”
e1“The research was conducted on winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced nitrogen fertilization N1 significantly lowered Fusarium grain infection relative to N2 and N3 under all tillage treatments.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- reduced fertilization (N1)e0
- Outcome
- Fusarium sp. grain infectione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- all tillage treatmentse0
- Comparator
- other (N2 and N3) nitrogen treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of reduced fertilization (N1) on Fusarium sp. grain infection in all tillage treatments was statistically lower in comparison with other (N2 and N3) nitrogen treatments.”
e1“The research was conducted on winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage at Magadenovac had the lowest percentage of Fusarium-infected wheat grains.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp.e0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Setting
- Magadenovace0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp. was recorded in conventional tillage on location Magadenovac and no tillage treatments on location Cacinci.”
Claim · model-written summary
No tillage at Cacinci had the lowest percentage of Fusarium-infected wheat grains.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- no tillage treatmentse0
- Outcome
- percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp.e0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Setting
- Cacincie0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest percentage of wheat grains infected with Fusarium sp. was recorded in conventional tillage on location Magadenovac and no tillage treatments on location Cacinci.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.