Claim · model-written summary
The 1.0 coefficient gave the highest water use efficiency in 2005.
- Treatment
- irrigation with 1.0 pa n evaporation coefficiente0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- 2005 growing seasone0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest water use efficiency was obtained under irrigation with 1.0 pa n evaporation coefficient in 2005 growing season”
t0“Maize”
Title
Irrigation Scheduling for Maize Grown under Middle Egypt Conditions
Manal M. El-Tantawy; A. Ouda; Aiman Khalil 2007
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Observation Irrigation treatments significantly affected the studied characters except the stated ear traits.
- Observation Rows per ear were not significantly affected in either season.
- Observation Grains per ear were not significantly affected in 2005.
- Intervention effect At 1.0 pan evaporation coefficient, maize yield fell 6.15% in 2005.
- Intervention effect At 1.0 pan evaporation coefficient, maize yield fell 8.05% in 2006.
- Intervention effect At 0.8 pan evaporation coefficient, maize yield fell 36.07% in 2005.
- Intervention effect At 0.8 pan evaporation coefficient, maize yield fell 35.97% in 2006.
- Observation The 1.2 coefficient gave the highest consumptive water use, 5894 in the first season.
- Observation The 1.2 coefficient gave the highest consumptive water use, 6170 m /ha in the second season.
- Observation The 1.2 coefficient tied for highest water use efficiency in 2006.
- Observation The 1.0 coefficient tied for highest water use efficiency in 2006.
- Association Ear length, ear diameter and grains per ear correlated positively with maize grain yield.
- Association Hundred grain weight correlated positively with maize grain yield.
- Association Regression found grain weight per ear, grains per ear and hundred grain weight positively correlated with maize yield.
- Association Principal components found ear length and grain weight per ear accounted for 69.07% of variation.