Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Final fruit set percentage was unchanged in 1982 and 1983.

A claim from The influence of paclobutrazol on the growth and cropping of sweet cherry cultivars. I. The effect of annual soil treatments on the growth and cropping of cv Early Rivers · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final fruit set percentage was unchanged in 1982 and 1983.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
paclobutrazole1
Outcome
percentage final fruit sete0
Direction
not influencede0
Qualifier
1982 and 1983e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage final fruit set was not influenced by the treatments in 1982 and 1983”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1009
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73
e1

“Annual treatments with paclobutrazol to the soil beneath cv Early Rivers sweet cherry trees significantly inhibited the growth of new extension shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–158

Title

The influence of paclobutrazol on the growth and cropping of sweet cherry cultivars. I. The effect of annual soil treatments on the growth and cropping of cv Early Rivers

A. D. Webster; J. D. Quinlan; P. J. Richardson Journal of Horticultural Science 1986. doi:10.1080/14620316.1986.11515728

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-a9b2dcd2e984f6afd92d5a1a923c9482ef17959722c6927219d6cdd337ac9c66 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

paclobutrazol · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.