Claim · model-written summary
C3D1 gave superior dry forage yield.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sorghum”
e0“treatment superior (C3D1) gave higher of green forage yield (38.60 and 31.73 t .ha-1) for both the first and third cut and dry forage yield”
Title
Samer A. H. Al-NemramyN; Nihad M.A. AL-dulimi Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.32649/ajas.2014.98277
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Dough-stage cutting gave superior height and stem diameter.
- Intervention effect Dough-stage cutting gave superior green forage yield across three cuts.
- Intervention effect Dough-stage cutting gave superior dry forage yield.
- Intervention effect Vegetative-stage cutting was superior for green leaf number and leaf-to-stem ratio.
- Intervention effect Flowering-stage cutting was superior for leaf area.
- Intervention effect Three-centimeter hill spacing gave superior first-cut height and green forage yield.
- Intervention effect Twelve-centimeter spacing gave superior height at cuts two and three and leaf area and green leaf number at all cuts.
- Association Cutting stage and spacing interacted significantly for most traits.
- Intervention effect C3D1 produced higher green forage yields in the first and third cuts.