Associationmodel-written summary

Penicillium lanosum 201 and Trichothecium roseum 2016 slowed growth processes of pine by 25.9–74.6 % on average.

A claim from Influence of automicobiota on qualitative and quantitative indicators of Scots pine seeds under in vitro conditions · 2020

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium lanosum 201 and Trichothecium roseum 2016 slowed growth processes of pine by 25.9–74.6 % on average.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Interactor
Penicillium lanosum 201Penicillium lanosume1other
Second interactor
Trichothecium roseum 2016Trichothecium roseume1other
Outcome
growth processese1
Direction
slowede1
Value
25.9–74.6 %e1
Qualifier
Fusarium oxysporum 206, Fusarium sambucinum 16e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichothecium roseum
Trichothecium roseum · Second interactorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of automicobiota on qualitative and quantitative indicators of Scots pine seeds under in vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115
e1

“According to the studies, Fusarium oxysporum 206, Fusarium sambucinum 16, Penicillium lanosum 201, Trichothecium roseum 2016 slowed growth processes on average by 25.9–74.6 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1814

Title

Influence of automicobiota on qualitative and quantitative indicators of Scots pine seeds under in vitro conditions

H. O. Boyko Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science 2020. doi:10.31548/forest2019.04.034

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-a9f2eeefb09cb71880acdad23293adcc9916095a3069b0e5ab4b0f7760b05c57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 20 in the model’s answer