Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T10 recorded maximum test weight of 8.39 g.

A claim from Economics of different nitrogen sources (organic and inorganic) in kharif pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 recorded maximum test weight of 8.39 g.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T10(25% RDN through VC + 75 % N through Urea + Azotobactor)e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.39 ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–110
e0

“treatment T10(25% RDN through VC + 75 % N through Urea + Azotobactor) recorded maximum plant height (277.17cm), plant dry weight (105.30g), tillers plant-1(3.40), crop growth rate (2.74 g m-2 day-1), relative growth rate (0.04 g g-1 day-1), ear plant-1 (3.57), length of ear (31.85), no. of grains ear-1 (3433.33), test weight (8.39 g), grain yield (4.97 t ha-1), straw yield(12.99 t ha-1), protein content (13.03%) and harvest index (27.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–494

Title

Economics of different nitrogen sources (organic and inorganic) in kharif pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Shobha Kumari; Sonam Mahawar Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-aa455faecde501f2ed53582adbb95b01dddbfaccf72b9088b08327ecfb819e01 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.