Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Impact of N-nano fertilizer on yield attributes, economic and quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition

PN Karanjikar; Mamta J Patange; PK Waghamre; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif season of 2021 at Agronomy Section, College of Agriculture, Latur (Maharashtra) to study the impact of n-nano fertilizer on yield attributes, economic and quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design. The results showed that the application of 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS (T5) recorded significantly highest yield attributes, seed yield (3967 kg ha-1) and test weight (20.77 g) over all the treatments except 75% RDN through urea soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of @ 45 DAS (T8) and 50% RDN through as soil application + 50% RDN through 2 sprays of nano-urea @ 30,45 DAS (T4). The highest gross monetary return GMR (85291 ₹ ha-1), net monetary return NMR (53825 ₹ ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.71) was observed with the 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS. Among the different treatments that application of urea through soil and application of nano urea through spray may increase both quantitative and qualitative yield of pearl millet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil urea at 75% RDN plus one nano-urea spray at 45 DAS at 25% RDN (T5) gave significantly highest yield attributes of pearl millet over all treatments (except T8 and T4).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS (T5) recorded significantly highest yield attributes, seed yield (3967 kg ha-1) and test weight (20.77 g) over all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave significantly highest pearl millet seed yield, 3967 kg ha-1, over all treatments (except T8 and T4).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3967 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS (T5) recorded significantly highest yield attributes, seed yield (3967 kg ha-1) and test weight (20.77 g) over all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave significantly highest pearl millet test weight, 20.77 g, over all treatments (except T8 and T4).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.77 ge0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS (T5) recorded significantly highest yield attributes, seed yield (3967 kg ha-1) and test weight (20.77 g) over all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest gross monetary return of pearl millet, 85291 ₹ ha-1, was observed with T5.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
gross monetary returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85291 ₹ ha-1e0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross monetary return GMR (85291 ₹ ha-1), net monetary return NMR (53825 ₹ ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.71) was observed with the 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest net monetary return of pearl millet, 53825 ₹ ha-1, was observed with T5.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
net monetary returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
53825 ₹ ha-1e0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross monetary return GMR (85291 ₹ ha-1), net monetary return NMR (53825 ₹ ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.71) was observed with the 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit:cost ratio of pearl millet, 2.71, was observed with T5.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DASe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.71e0
Setting
rainfed conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross monetary return GMR (85291 ₹ ha-1), net monetary return NMR (53825 ₹ ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.71) was observed with the 75% RDN through urea as soil application + 25% RDN through 1 spray of nano- urea @ 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that soil application of urea together with a nano-urea spray may increase both quantitative and qualitative yield of pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
quantitative and qualitative yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of urea through soil and application of nano urea through spray may increase both quantitative and qualitative yield of pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1186 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.