Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The PROM by nano urea interaction did not significantly affect plant height, effective tillers or earhead length.

A claim from Effect of PROM and Nano Urea on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The PROM by nano urea interaction did not significantly affect plant height, effective tillers or earhead length.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
PROM and nano ureae0
Outcome
plant height at 45 DAS and at harvest, number of effective tillers per plant and earhead lengthe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of PROM and nano urea did not exert any significant effect on plant height at 45 DAS and at harvest, number of effective tillers per plant and earhead length of pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1855

Title

Effect of PROM and Nano Urea on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet

Nita K. Kuniya; Shivangini G. Gandhi; Shamal Chaudhary Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2025. doi:10.9734/ajsspn/2025/v11i3550

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1533bfde4b4fa16003a85ceff4172b883fb9f74a1fa352e462341e966ff30e13 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 143 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.