Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Influence of Fertilizer Loaded Nanoclay Superabsorbent Polymer Composite (NCPC) on Dynamics of P and N Availability and their Uptake by Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in an Inceptisols

Subhas Sarkar; S. C. Datta

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The main aim of this research was to study the P and N releasing behaviour from fertilizer loaded nanoclay superabsorbent polymer composite (NCPC) and to test its effectiveness as a carrier of slow release fertilizer using pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as test crop grown under Inceptisols. Results revealed that availability of Olsen P, 0.01M CaCl 2 -extractable P and mineral N in soils increased significantly due to addition of fertilizer as NCPC over conventional fertilizer (CF), at same dose of fertilizer application. Availability of P and N in soils receiving low dose of fertilizer (LDF) as NCPC (NCPC-L) was statistically at par with that of high dose of fertilizer (HDF) as CF (CF-H), particularly at critical crop growth stages. Addition of NCPC-H resulted in 18% additional biomass yield and 17% and 11% additional P and N uptake by pearl millet over CF-H, respectively. Similarly, at LDF, biomass yield, P and N uptake increased to 26, 23 and 16%, respectively, under NCPC (NCPC-L) treated soils than that in CF (CF-L) treated soil. Significant build-up in different non labile pools of inorganic P fractions (Al-P, Fe-P, occluded-P, Ca-P) was recorded on addition of CF as compared to NCPC application, irrespective of fertilizer doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NCPC increased Olsen P availability over conventional fertilizer at the same dose.

Treatment
fertilizer as NCPCe0
Outcome
availability of Olsen Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional fertilizer (CF)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Olsen P, 0.01M CaCl 2 -extractable P and mineral N in soils increased significantly due to addition of fertilizer as NCPC over conventional fertilizer (CF), at same dose of fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NCPC increased CaCl2 extractable P availability over conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
fertilizer as NCPCe0
Outcome
0.01M CaCl 2 -extractable Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional fertilizer (CF)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Olsen P, 0.01M CaCl 2 -extractable P and mineral N in soils increased significantly due to addition of fertilizer as NCPC over conventional fertilizer (CF), at same dose of fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NCPC increased soil mineral N availability over conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
fertilizer as NCPCe0
Outcome
mineral N in soilse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional fertilizer (CF)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“mineral N in soils increased significantly due to addition of fertilizer as NCPC over conventional fertilizer (CF), at same dose of fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose NCPC soil P and N availability was statistically at par with high dose conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
low dose of fertilizer (LDF) as NCPC (NCPC-L)e0
Outcome
Availability of P and N in soilse0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
high dose of fertilizer (HDF) as CF (CF-H)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Availability of P and N in soils receiving low dose of fertilizer (LDF) as NCPC (NCPC-L) was statistically at par with that of high dose of fertilizer (HDF) as CF (CF-H), particularly at critical crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose NCPC increased millet biomass yield by 18% over high dose conventional fertilizer.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
NCPC-He0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
additionale0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
CF-He0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of NCPC-H resulted in 18% additional biomass yield and 17% and 11% additional P and N uptake by pearl millet over CF-H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose NCPC increased millet P uptake by 17%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
NCPC-He0
Outcome
P and N uptakee0
Direction
additionale0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
CF-He0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of NCPC-H resulted in 18% additional biomass yield and 17% and 11% additional P and N uptake by pearl millet over CF-H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose NCPC increased millet N uptake by 11%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
NCPC-He0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
additionale0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
CF-He0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of NCPC-H resulted in 18% additional biomass yield and 17% and 11% additional P and N uptake by pearl millet over CF-H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose NCPC increased millet biomass yield by 26% over conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
NCPC (NCPC-L)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26e0
Comparator
CF (CF-L)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“at LDF, biomass yield, P and N uptake increased to 26, 23 and 16%, respectively, under NCPC (NCPC-L) treated soils than that in CF (CF-L) treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose NCPC increased millet P uptake by 23%.

Treatment
NCPC (NCPC-L)e0
Outcome
P and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23e0
Comparator
CF (CF-L)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“at LDF, biomass yield, P and N uptake increased to 26, 23 and 16%, respectively, under NCPC (NCPC-L) treated soils than that in CF (CF-L) treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose NCPC increased millet N uptake by 16%.

Treatment
NCPC (NCPC-L)e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
CF (CF-L)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“at LDF, biomass yield, P and N uptake increased to 26, 23 and 16%, respectively, under NCPC (NCPC-L) treated soils than that in CF (CF-L) treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional fertilizer significantly built up nonlabile inorganic P pools compared with NCPC.

Treatment
CFe0
Outcome
non labile pools of inorganic P fractions (Al-P, Fe-P, occluded-P, Ca-P)e0
Direction
build-upe0
Comparator
NCPC applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant build-up in different non labile pools of inorganic P fractions (Al-P, Fe-P, occluded-P, Ca-P) was recorded on addition of CF as compared to NCPC application, irrespective of fertilizer doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1255 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.