Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Different Nutrient Management Practices on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Transplanted Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Manish Yadav; N. J. Jadav; Dileep Kumar; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertility management on growth, yield attributes and yield of pearlmillet in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with ten treatments and four replications during summer, 2019 at Anand, Gujarat. The experiment comprises of different nutrient management practices including 100% and 75% RDF with 15 t and 10 t FYM along with Bio NP consortia. A significant higher growth and yield parameters enhancement with the application of 100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortia was recorded in plant height, number of tillers, length of ear head, protein content and biological yield. The treatment T5 produced maximum (91.5 q ha-1) biological yield and statistically it was on par with T9 and T5. However, the lowest biomass production (73.0 q ha-1) was reported in treatment T1. Results of different nutrient management practices on days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, ear head girth and test weight were found non-significant. Protein content of pearlmillet was increased from 7.5% to 9.06% under different nutrient management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined RDF, FYM and Bio NP treatment significantly increased plant height and tillers.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortiae0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillerse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant higher growth and yield parameters enhancement with the application of 100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortia was recorded in plant height, number of tillers, length of ear head, protein content and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased ear head length.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortiae0
Outcome
length of ear heade0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant higher growth and yield parameters enhancement with the application of 100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortia was recorded in plant height, number of tillers, length of ear head, protein content and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased protein content.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortiae0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant higher growth and yield parameters enhancement with the application of 100% RDF + 15 t FYM ha-1 + Bio NP Consortia was recorded in plant height, number of tillers, length of ear head, protein content and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the maximum biological yield of 91.5 q ha-1, statistically on par with T9.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
91.5 q ha-1e0
Comparator
T9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T5 produced maximum (91.5 q ha-1) biological yield and statistically it was on par with T9 and T5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had the lowest biomass production, 73.0 q ha-1.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
73.0 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the lowest biomass production (73.0 q ha-1) was reported in treatment T1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient practice effects on flowering, maturity, ear head girth and test weight were nonsignificant.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
different nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, ear head girth and test weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of different nutrient management practices on days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, ear head girth and test weight were found non-significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet protein content increased from 7.5% to 9.06% across nutrient practices.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
different nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.06%e0
Qualifier
7.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of pearlmillet was increased from 7.5% to 9.06% under different nutrient management practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1094 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.