Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The nano phosphate treatment produced maximum protein content.

A claim from Effect of Nano Phosphatic Fertilizer on Nutrient Content and Uptake by Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Crop · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nano phosphate treatment produced maximum protein content.

Taxon
Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)Cenchrus americanust0
Treatment
2.5 time reduction of RDP through nano phosphatic fertilizere0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum NPK content and uptake as well as protein content and uptake were observed with the application of 2.5 time reduction of RDP through nano phosphatic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–795
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107

Title

Effect of Nano Phosphatic Fertilizer on Nutrient Content and Uptake by Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Crop

Atul Dhansil; N.M. Zalawadia; Bhawani Singh Prajapat; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.264

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ffd4c4a5ed4981ba83f3617caab12bb2d6bd6ca3254b2aa5bc48da60c4eb0447 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.