Claim · model-written summary
Non-nipping gave more plant height than nipping at 25 DAS in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- non-nippinge3
- Outcome
- plant heighte3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- nipping at 25 DASe3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e3“In case of nipping at 25 DAS recorded higher branches per plant, pods per plant yield and economics, whereas, non-nipping was observed more plant height”
Title
Neha Joshi; VP Usadadia; Barkha .; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6d.10780
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Raised bed land configuration gave significantly higher growth, yield and economics than flat bed in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Among irrigation levels, irrigation at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS gave higher growth and yield parameters and economics in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Nipping at 25 DAS gave higher branches per plant, pods per plant, yield and economics than non-nipping in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Different treatments of land configuration, irrigation and nipping did not significantly affect 100 seed weight or harvest index in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Different treatments of land configuration, irrigation levels and nipping significantly influenced grain and stover yield in chickpea.