Abstract
An experiment was conducted at soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsari during rabi seasons of 2017-18. Plant height, branches per plant, dry matter accumulation, pods per plant, 100 seed weight, grain and stover yield as well as harvest index and economics significantly influenced by different treatments of land configuration, irrigation levels and nipping. The field experiment consist of three land configuration (L1: Flat bed, L2: Ridge and furrow and L3: Raised bed), four irrigation levels (I1: 20 DAS, I2: 20 & 40 DAS, I3: 20, 40 & 60 DAS and I4: 20, 40, 60 & 80 DAS) and two nipping treatments (N0: Non-nipping and N1: Nipping at 25 DAS). Raised method of land configuration recorded significantly higher growth, yield and economics than flat bed. Among irrigation levels, irrigation applied at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS showed higher growth and yield parameters as well as economics. In case of nipping at 25 DAS recorded higher branches per plant, pods per plant yield and economics, whereas, non-nipping was observed more plant height. However, 100 seed weight and harvest index was not affected significantly by different treatments of land configuration irrigation and nipping.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed land configuration gave significantly higher growth, yield and economics than flat bed in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Raised method of land configuratione1
- Outcome
- growth, yield and economicse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- flat bede1
- Setting
- soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsarie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“An experiment was conducted at soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsari during rabi seasons of 2017-18”
e1“Raised method of land configuration recorded significantly higher growth, yield and economics than flat bed”
Claim · model-written summary
Among irrigation levels, irrigation at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS gave higher growth and yield parameters and economics in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation applied at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DASe2
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameters as well as economicse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- irrigation levelse2
- Setting
- soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsarie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“An experiment was conducted at soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsari during rabi seasons of 2017-18”
e2“Among irrigation levels, irrigation applied at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS showed higher growth and yield parameters as well as economics”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at 25 DAS gave higher branches per plant, pods per plant, yield and economics than non-nipping in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Nipping at 25 DASe3
- Outcome
- branches per plant, pods per plant yield and economicse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- non-nippinge3
- Setting
- soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsarie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“An experiment was conducted at soil and water management research farm, NAU, Navsari during rabi seasons of 2017-18”
e3“In case of nipping at 25 DAS recorded higher branches per plant, pods per plant yield and economics, whereas, non-nipping was observed more plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-nipping gave more plant height than nipping at 25 DAS in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- non-nippinge3
- Outcome
- plant heighte3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- nipping at 25 DASe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e3“In case of nipping at 25 DAS recorded higher branches per plant, pods per plant yield and economics, whereas, non-nipping was observed more plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Different treatments of land configuration, irrigation and nipping did not significantly affect 100 seed weight or harvest index in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- different treatments of land configuration irrigation and nippinge4
- Outcome
- 100 seed weight and harvest indexe4
- Direction
- not affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e4“However, 100 seed weight and harvest index was not affected significantly by different treatments of land configuration irrigation and nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
Different treatments of land configuration, irrigation levels and nipping significantly influenced grain and stover yield in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- different treatments of land configuration, irrigation levels and nippinge5
- Outcome
- grain and stover yielde5
- Direction
- significantly influencede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e5“Plant height, branches per plant, dry matter accumulation, pods per plant, 100 seed weight, grain and stover yield as well as harvest index and economics significantly influenced by different treatments of land configuration, irrigation levels and nipping”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.