Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four irrigations at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling gave the highest growth and yield.

A claim from Growth and yield of chickpea as influenced by irrigation and nutrient management · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling gave the highest growth and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
four irrigations scheduled at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling stagese0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of chickpea was highest with four irrigations scheduled at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–303

Title

Growth and yield of chickpea as influenced by irrigation and nutrient management

M.N. Mustafa; G. Karuna Sagar; V. Chandrika; et al. 2008

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-cb23e2b0b879d6d454a46665766faba59bfb02b02547166ec802271e36f835e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Preflowering shade decreased chickpea harvest index and seed yield.

    Shading, Defoliation and Light Enrichment Effects on Chickpea in Northern Latitudes · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Irrigation at flowering reduced chickpea grain yield.

    Drought tolerance indices based evaluation of chickpea advanced lines under different water treatments · 2015

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Drought at flowering reduced chickpea seed yield per plant.

    THE EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS AT DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL STAGES ON GROWTH INDICES OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) IN GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Moisture stress until pre-flowering and pod formation reduced seed yield more severely than stress at flowering.

    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES TO DIFFERENT MOISTURE STRESS IN BANGLADESH · 2021 · compared with flowering stage

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Drought stress at flowering reduced pod number, number of seeds per plant and yield.

    Response Of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes To Drought Stress At Different Growth Stages · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Two chlorothalonil applications increased yield.

    Foliar fungicides to manage ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei] of chickpea in Canada · 2003

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Putrescine increased pod set by 31% when applied at flowering.

    Putrescine Increases Floral Retention, Pod Set and Seed Yield in Cold Stressed Chickpea · 2005

    Same direction

  8. positive
    In the second year, 75 mm irrigation at flowering increased chickpea grain yield by 7% compared with no irrigation.

    IRRIGATION OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUML.) INCREASES YIELD BUT NOT WATER PRODUCTIVITY · 2015 · compared with no irrigation

    Same direction

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    I3 produced higher chickpea yield attributes and grain and haulm yields than other moisture regimes and was on par with I4.

    Effect of Moisture Regimes on Yield Attributes, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer arietinium L.) · 2017 · compared with 0.9 IW: CPE (I4)

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Among irrigation levels, irrigation at 20, 40, 60 and 80 DAS gave higher growth and yield parameters and economics in chickpea.

    Influence of land configuration, irrigation levels and nipping on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2020 · compared with irrigation levels

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Irrigation at flowering reduced chickpea grain yield.

    Drought tolerance indices based evaluation of chickpea advanced lines under different water treatments · 2015

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Irrigation significantly reduced chickpea grain yield through excessive vegetative growth at the expense of pod formation.

    Dry Matter, Nodulation and Nutrient Uptake in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as Influenced by Irrigation and Phosphorus · 1989

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation reduced pods per plant by 21.29% at ECiw 6 dS/m.

    Identification of Salt Tolerant Chickpea Genotypes Based on Yield and Salinity Indices · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Deficit irrigation had no effect on height, biological yield and branching number of chickpea.

    Assessment of deficit irrigation impact on agronomic parameters and water use efficiency of six chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) cultivars under Mediterranean semi-arid climate · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Double irrigation reduced seed yield of the two legumes by 45% versus full irrigation.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008 · compared with full irrigation

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Skipping one irrigation significantly reduced chickpea growth characters in both seasons.

    Effect of Skipping One Irrigation and Potassium Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Chickpea Plants · 2013

    Opposite direction

115 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.