Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Effect of moisture regimes on yield attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” were carried out at College Farm, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. Among moisture regimes, Irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW: CPE (I3) produced significantly higher yield attributes and grain and haulm yields of chickpea but it was on par with 0.9 IW: CPE (I4). The JG-11 variety has produced higher grain yield than Annegiri. Among nutrient uptake, N, P and K uptake was more in 0.6 IW: CPE (I3) but it was on par with 0.9 IW: CPE (I4) and significantly superior as compared to I1 (Rainfed) and I2 (0.3 IW: CPE) while, varieties did not differ significantly in respect of NPK uptake. Protein content was recorded significantly superior in 0.9 IW: CPE (I4) it was on par with 0.6 IW: CPE (I3). The varieties have no influence on protein content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
I3 produced higher chickpea yield attributes and grain and haulm yields than other moisture regimes and was on par with I4.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW: CPE (I3)e0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and grain and haulm yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW: CPE (I4)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW: CPE (I3) produced significantly higher yield attributes and grain and haulm yields of chickpea but it was on par with 0.9 IW: CPE (I4)”
Claim · model-written summary
JG-11 had higher grain yield than Annegiri.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- JG-11e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Annegirie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The JG-11 variety has produced higher grain yield than Annegiri.”
t0“Chickpea Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P and K uptake was higher under I3 than rainfed and I2, and on par with I4.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW: CPE (I3)e0
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- I1 (Rainfed) and I2 (0.3 IW: CPE)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P and K uptake was more in 0.6 IW: CPE (I3) but it was on par with 0.9 IW: CPE (I4) and significantly superior as compared to I1 (Rainfed) and I2 (0.3 IW: CPE)”
t0“Chickpea Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties did not differ significantly in NPK uptake.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- varietiese0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- did not differe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“varieties did not differ significantly in respect of NPK uptake”
t0“Chickpea Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content was superior under I4 and on par with I3.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 0.9 IW: CPE (I4)e0
- Outcome
- Protein contente0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- 0.6 IW: CPE (I3)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protein content was recorded significantly superior in 0.9 IW: CPE (I4) it was on par with 0.6 IW: CPE (I3)”
t0“Chickpea Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties had no influence on protein content.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- varietiese0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- no influencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The varieties have no influence on protein content.”
t0“Chickpea Cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.