Paper · 2008

Growth and yield of chickpea as influenced by irrigation and nutrient management

M.N. Mustafa; G. Karuna Sagar; V. Chandrika; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi, 2004 on sandy loam soils to study the response of chickpea to irrigation and nutrient management practices. Results revealed that growth and yield of chickpea was highest with four irrigations scheduled at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling stages. Among the nutrient management practices, 100 per cent recommended dose of N and P + Rhizobium + PSB has resulted in higher growth, yield attributes and yield of chickpea. Interaction between irrigation and nutrient management practices was significant with respect to yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling gave the highest growth and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
four irrigations scheduled at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling stagese0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of chickpea was highest with four irrigations scheduled at sowing, branching, flowering and pod filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and P plus Rhizobium and PSB produced higher growth, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of N and P + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 per cent recommended dose of N and P + Rhizobium + PSB has resulted in higher growth, yield attributes and yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–474 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nutrient management interacted significantly for yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigation and nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction between irrigation and nutrient management practices was significant with respect to yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.