Paper · 2005 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance

D. Harris; W. A. Breese; J. V. D. K. Kumar Rao

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

On-farm seed priming with water is a low-cost, low-risk technology that is easily adopted by resource-poor farmers. It increases the yield of tropical and subtropical annual crops in marginal areas by a combination of better crop establishment and improved individual plant performance. The effects of seed priming, i.e. soaking seeds overnight in water before sowing, on plant growth and development are consequences of faster germination, emergence, and more vigorous early growth. Results from in-vitro, on-station and on-farm experiments are discussed. Recent work has tested opportunities for resource-poor farmers to use seed priming as a vehicle for applying biofertilisers (Rhizobia). Preliminary results from field experiments suggest that these interventions are very effective over and above the already demonstrated benefits of priming with water alone. In a pot experiment using chickpea, combining a Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming significantly increased nodulation but had little effect on yield. Nevertheless, the results confirmed that Rhizobium inoculation is compatible with on-farm seed priming. Observations in the field have shown that some primed crops show enhanced resistance to disease, either as a consequence of increased vigour, altered phenology, or due to some more fundamental mechanism associated with exposure of seeds to anaerobic conditions during priming. Priming seeds of a highly susceptible cultivar of pearl millet in water for 8 h before sowing significantly reduced the incidence of downy mildew in artificially infected seedlings from 80% to less than 60%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming significantly increased nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
combining a Rhizobium inoculation with seed priminge1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
pot experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a pot experiment using chickpea, combining a Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming significantly increased nodulation but had little effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
combining a Rhizobium inoculation with seed priminge1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Setting
pot experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a pot experiment using chickpea, combining a Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming significantly increased nodulation but had little effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming pearl millet seeds of a highly susceptible cultivar in water for 8 h before sowing significantly reduced downy mildew incidence in artificially infected seedlings, from 80% to below 60%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Material
highly susceptible cultivare2
Treatment
in water for 8 h before sowinge2
Interactor
downy mildewPeronosporaceaee2pathogen
Outcome
incidence of downy mildewe2
Direction
reducede2
Value
80% to less than 60%e2
Qualifier
artificially infected seedlingse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Priming seeds of a highly susceptible cultivar of pearl millet in water for 8 h before sowing significantly reduced the incidence of downy mildew in artificially infected seedlings from 80% to less than 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Observations in the field show that some primed crops have enhanced resistance to disease.

Taxon
cropse3
Outcome
enhanced resistance to diseasee3
Setting
in the fielde3

Verbatim

e3

“Observations in the field have shown that some primed crops show enhanced resistance to disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preliminary field results suggest that seed priming used to apply Rhizobia is very effective beyond priming with water alone.

Taxon
cropse6
Treatment
seed priming as a vehicle for applying biofertilisers (Rhizobia)e5
Interactor
Rhizobiae5symbiont
Outcome
effectivee4
Direction
very effectivee4
Comparator
priming with water alonee4

Verbatim

e4

“Preliminary results from field experiments suggest that these interventions are very effective over and above the already demonstrated benefits of priming with water alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–864 · show in text ↑
e5

“Recent work has tested opportunities for resource-poor farmers to use seed priming as a vehicle for applying biofertilisers (Rhizobia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–691 · show in text ↑
e6

“It increases the yield of tropical and subtropical annual crops in marginal areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–197 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 200 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

seed treatment · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.